All Categories
Featured
Table of Contents
Secret challenges consist of recognizing and handling these threats effectively, stabilizing worker requires with compliance, and adapting MTC guidelines for protected and affordable movement. If handled well, remote work can be a tactical benefit for multinationals, offering operational connection and access to skill. However, counting on out-of-date guidelines could develop liabilities, such as unforeseen tax exposure and compliance burdens.
Designing a Collaborative Outsourcing Ecosystem for 2026Daida Hadzic is Director, KPMG LLP.
Words by Kevin McKenna, Senior Advisor, EMIR Mirages frequently trick the eye in the desert, appealing water and relief where there is none. The Middle East, at the minute, can appear intimidating to international service leaders who wrongly look at it as one uniform bloc. But unlike mirages, and in spite of geopolitical stress in the broader area, the Gulf Co-Operation Council (GCC) economies' potential is no illusion.
Lots of local leaders of international business still struggle to unshackle themselves from mistaken beliefs and predispositions held by a worldwide HQ that frequently looks at the Middle East through a narrow keyhole. Global budget holders' frequently misguided viewpoints can lead to missed opportunities and prevent growth. With over a years of experience advising local business leaders in the Middle East, I have actually seen how crucial it is to make the case for the region by concentrating on these 5 simple actions.
This location also runs extremely differently from our domestic market, so do not expect the same direct pathways to development and timelines." This strategy needs robust preparation, clear interaction, a deep local network and a rich understanding of the local business environment due to the fact that, eventually, you need to provide on that promised development.
By dispelling misunderstandings and engaging proactively, local CEOs can unlock the region's true potential, changing perceived mirages into a sanctuary of opportunities waiting to be found.
Set up a session with our experts to check out how YCP can help you in addressing your business challenges.
Regarding Israel's controversial policies of limiting humanitarian help into Gaza, the Trump administration has followed Netanyahu's lead.
Taken together, these policies show 2 intertwined aspects of the Trump administration's approach to Gaza: a deference to Prime Minister Netanyahu's choices and a deprioritization of humanitarian needs. The administration has not pressed back on the Israeli government's plans to occupy Gaza City and by force evacuate Palestinians into a smaller area of Gaza.
He subsequently posted on social media that the only method to get captives out of Gaza is when Hamas is "faced and damaged," apparently providing indirect support for Israel's broadening operations. Meanwhile, the Trump administration's contented approach to Gaza's aggravating humanitarian situationmarked by a formal statement of starvation in parts of Gazaunderscores the destructive effect of its submission to the Israeli government's refusal to provide appropriate aid to the besieged territory. They can best be captured by unpacking how Israel and Saudi Arabiaeach with strong ties to the United Stateshave reacted. Not remarkably, their responses vary considerably in all 3 cases. Their responses likewise show the growing disparity between these two regional powers as they pursue extensively varying methods for how to shape the Middle East's emerging order.
Israel has actually not translated these military gains into withstanding tactical wins. For Saudi Arabiathe Arab world's existing center of gravitythe vital for economic diversity has sustained a drive to de-escalate stress in the region, a push for post-conflict stabilization in the Levant, and goals to build out commercial and trade ties across the Middle East and beyond.
As with Israel, nevertheless, whether and how Saudi Arabia equates its broadening take advantage of into lasting strategic gains remains to be seen. Israel was highly helpful of the U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities.
Going forward, Netanyahu will want to keep U.S. assistance, specifically if Iran starts to reconstruct its ballistic missile toolbox or restart enrichment. Israel has made clear that it will strike Iran againideally with U.S. supportin either scenario. Absent a clear U.S. "traffic signal" opposing additional Israeli military intervention in Iran, possibly coupled with a U.S.Significantly, the Gulf views Israel, not Iran, as the primary threat to regional stability. Moving forward, Riyadh will press hard for a diplomatic resolution to Iran's dispute with the United States and Israel. While Saudi Arabia most likely is heartened by Iran's weakened position, it views with alarm the possibility of deepening interstate conflict in between Israel and Iran.
Latest Posts
Future-Focused Operational Models for 2026 Ecosystems
Analysing 2026 Market Research for Future Growth
Corporate Strategy in the Changing GCC Landscape
